Saw this on Car and Driver and figured it'd spark some discussion here. Toyota brought out a whole lineup of "Snowhunter" concepts to SEMA this year — Tundra, Tacoma, 4Runner, Land Cruiser, and Sequoia — all done up in white/camo wraps with tracked drive systems instead of tires. CALTY Design (Toyota's design studio in Ann Arbor) led the build, which makes sense given Michigan's lake-effect snow.
The Tacoma version is the one that caught my eye. From the article:
- Roof rack plus a full-length bed rack with MOLLE panels
- Awning, extra cargo storage, recovery gear, bed lighting
- Lift kit using Toyota Genuine Parts/TRD components to clear the tracked undercarriage
- Rigid auxiliary lighting all around, like the rest of the Snowhunter lineup
Obviously the tracked system itself is never going to be a bolt-on option for normal owners (they didn't even say who actually supplied the tracks — mentioned something about Dominator systems being used up north), but the accessory loadout is the part that's realistic. Full bed rack, awning, rock lights, roof rack — that's all stuff a lot of us already run or are considering.
Got me thinking about real-world tradeoffs though. A loaded rack system plus awning plus lift is a good chunk of extra weight and more stuff bolted to the frame and bed rails. Anyone here running a similar "overland light" setup on a 2nd or 3rd gen want to chime in on what it's actually done to your maintenance routine — tire wear, fuel economy hit, squeaks/rattles, bed rail stress? Curious if the concept truck fantasy matches the daily reality.